We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
BenchmarkOpen Accesscc iconby iconnc iconnd icon

Ultra-fast conductive media for RNA electrophoretic mobility shift assays

    Samantha Z Brown

    Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary & Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

    ,
    Lebaron C Agostini

    Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary & Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

    ,
    Henry L Thomsett

    Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary & Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

    &
    Jonathan R Brody

    *Author for correspondence:

    E-mail Address: jonathan.brody@jefferson.edu

    Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary & Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2019-0111

    The use of RNA electrophoretic mobility shift assays (REMSAs) for analysis of RNA–protein interactions have been limited to lengthy assay time and qualitative assessment. To vastly improve assay efficiency, feasibility and quality of data procured from REMSAs, we combine here some of the best-known labeling and electrophoretic techniques. Nucleic acid fragments are end-labeled with fluorescent tags, as opposed to the radioactive or biotin tags. The fluorescent probes may be detected directly from the electrophoresis gel, eliminating the need for cumbersome membrane transfer and immunoblotting. Modifying the REMSA protocol to include low-molarity, lithium borate conductive media and near-infrared-labeled probes allows for a reduction assay time, quantitative comparison between experimental conditions and crisp band resolution (i.e., optimized results).

    METHOD SUMMARY

    We present an improvement in resolution, speed and ease of RNA electrophoretic mobility shift assays. First, sensitive and quantitative detection of gel shifts can be improved with near-infrared tagged RNA oligos, as opposed to more toxic and cumbersome labeling methods, such as radioisotopes or biotin tags. Second, for improvement of resolution and efficiency, traditional Tris-based conductive running media are replaced with low-molarity, lithium borate-conductive media. These improvements to the methodology significantly reduce assay time, as well as improve the quality and overall utility of this technique in the study of RNA–protein interactions in vitro.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

    References

    • 1. Garner MM, Revzin A. The use of gel electrophoresis to detect and study nucleic acid–protein interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 11(10), 395–396 (1986). • Founding paper on gel electrophoresis principles for the separation of nucleic acids and proteins together in solution.
    • 2. Fried MG. Measurement of protein-DNA interaction parameters by electrophoresis mobility shift assay. Electrophoresis 10(5–6), 366–376 (1989). • Founding paper on gel electrophoresis principles for the separation of nucleic acids and proteins together in solution.
    • 3. Rio DC. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays for RNA–protein complexes. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2014(4), 435–440 (2014). • Founding paper on gel electrophoresis principles for the separation of nucleic acids and proteins together in solution.
    • 4. Hsieh YW, Alqadah A, Chuang CF. An optimized protocol for electrophoretic mobility shift assay using infrared fluorescent dye-labeled oligonucleotides. J. Vis. Exp. doi:10.3791/54863(117) (2016) (Epub ahead of print). •• Important principle paper for explaining the concept of fluorescence-based shift assays.
    • 5. Hellman LM, Fried MG. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for detecting protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nat. Protoc. 2(8), 1849–1861 (2007). • Overview of electrophoretic mobility shift assay principles with outline of important technical steps.
    • 6. Fillebeen C, Wilkinson N, Pantopoulos K. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for the study of RNA–protein interactions: the IRE/IRP example. J. Vis. Exp. doi:10.3791/52230(94) (2014) (Epub ahead of print). • Overview of RNA electrophoretic mobility shift assays principles with outline of important technical steps.
    • 7. Poulin-Laprade D, Burrus V. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay using radiolabeled DNA probes. Methods Mol. Biol. 1334, 1–15 (2015). • Complete overview of the radiolabeled EMSA method technique and principles.
    • 8. Brody JR, Calhoun ES, Gallmeier E, Creavalle TD, Kern SE. Ultra-fast high-resolution agarose electrophoresis of DNA and RNA using low-molarity conductive media. BioTechniques 37(4), 598, 600, 602 (2004). •• Principle paper for discovering and highlighting the advantages of low-molarity (LB) media over the traditional tris-based method.
    • 9. Brody JR, Kern SE. Sodium boric acid: a Tris-free, cooler conductive medium for DNA electrophoresis. BioTechniques 36(2), 214–216 (2004). •• Principle paper for discovering and highlighting the advantages of a Tris-free (sodium boric acid) media over the traditional tris-based method.
    • 10. Brody JR, Kern SE. History and principles of conductive media for standard DNA electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 333(1), 1–13 (2004). •• Principle paper surveying the history and guiding principles behind the advantages and limitations of different conductive media.
    • 11. Ruscher K, Reuter M, Kupper D, Trendelenburg G, Dirnagl U, Meisel A. A fluorescence based non-radioactive electrophoretic mobility shift assay. J. Biotechnol. 78(2), 163–170 (2000). •• Important founding paper for explaining the concept of fluorescence-based shift assays.
    • 12. Sengupta S, Jang BC, Wu MT, Paik JH, Furneaux H, Hla T. The RNA-binding protein HuR regulates the expression of cyclooxygenase-2. J. Biol. Chem. 278(27), 25227–25233 (2003). • Citation for the validated, positive control as an HuR target in these experiments.
    • 13. Peng SS, Chen CY, Xu N, Shyu AB. RNA stabilization by the AU-rich element binding protein, HuR, an ELAV protein. EMBO J. 17(12), 3461–3470 (1998). • Citation for ELAVL1/HuR as the primary protein exemplified in this technique.
    • 14. Lal S, Zarei M, Chand SN et al. WEE1 inhibition in pancreatic cancer cells is dependent on DNA repair status in a context dependent manner. Sci. Rep. 6, 33323 (2016). • Citation for the negative control, and the experimental target, WEE1, as an HuR in these experiments and highlighting the biologic importance of HuR.
    • 15. Gerstle JT, Fried MG. Measurement of binding kinetics using the gel electrophoresis mobility shift assay. Electrophoresis 14(8), 725–731 (1993). • Understanding applications of gel electrophoresis for assessing oligonucleotide binding kinetics.